shoddy90 wrote:It's your thread slingbacks, thanks to you for the opportunity for some fun and interraction, but as I said, I just had a notion to toy with the semantics, which was the reason I did not include a suffix, as you can now see.
So, all friends here again, and I suppose time for more serious consideration of matters homo, at which an off board answer to the original question could be that,
a homosexual is someone who is entirely predisposed to sex with others of the same gender, for no reason other than that they are part of the same sexual group, although of course, group sex would require more thoughts (and a new thread).
Now, where the board is concerned, the baseline for non homo; i.e. hetero-sexual behaviour, would be a guy getting a shoejob from a girl, or a girl getting a shoejob from a guy,
but
if the girl giving the shoejob wears mens shoe styles, then would that be homosexual ?
or
if a guy has a pair of 6” red patent pumps, so delicious, they make your heart race and wish that you could spend hours slowly fondling, tasting, kissing and licking every last millimeter of delicious smoothness, making the heels wet enough to ..- sorry, carried away for a minute, i.e. a classic female style, and he gives another guy a shoejob with them, would that be homosexual ?
Difficult then, so for the benefit of any who ask themselves the same question, could we perhaps agree that:
Giving a shoejob to someone of the same sex, with a shoe by convention normally appropriate to that (same) gender, is gay,
but as the original question was posed with a male bias, I would say that,
it is only gay if none of you are wearing heels
and in summary;
if the shoes are cute, any notion of sexual orientation or of a particular sexual predisposition is irrelevant, and may be overcome (cum-over?)
Well slingbacks, took some thought, but I think now covers the question you posed at the beginning of the thread.
Hope it helps.
Phew, just glad to be a shoe-sexual myself, so much easier !
