Shoe age cumming , Need help

[Ellen]

"that pdo statement, is as inaccurate as passing a judgment that as the murderer and rapist Brudos had a shoe fetish, then everyone with a shoe fetish is a rapist and killer, surmising that all cross dressers must be homosexuals or stating that enjoying the shoes of family members is incest."

I have to completely disagree with you here as what you have used as examples do not stack up against the subject. If I caught someone cumming over my granddaughter's shoes then I would report them and let the authorities deal with them. We as adults have an obligation both naturally and morally to protect all children from the dangers of definates and possibilities. I understand that you cannot automatically pigeon hole someone at first glance but, actively and knowingly doing things to a child's footwear (16 and younger) BECAUSE it belongs to or belonged to a child is at least suspect and at worst...?
By deleting certain words that draw attention to that kind of behaviour, is that not covering it up?
If I'm not an accepted member of this group because I have morals that extend to questioning the mindset of others when alarm bells begin ringing then, by all means delete my account and I will go quietly into the night.
I would like to add that my post was simply to gently guide that person and explain that by getting sexually aroused by a small piece of shaped leather is not just that, it is the connection it has to the person it is designed for.
If you are aroused because it is a 'childs shoe' then you have to question why and where that arousal will eventually lead you. If it is because you like women with small feet, i.e. (for want of a better word) a midget then that divide has to be drawn, otherwise you cannot blame anyone for suspecting the 'P word'. Make as many similarities to other fetish's as you like but it is wrong to disregard this as just another fetish.
I am not outright accusing him of being one, my guidance was to warn him of that distinction that has to be made when talking about children's shoes. I'm sure many parents would not see anything other than a man/ young adult masturbating over a shoe that belonged to his 15 year old daughter and the P word would spring instantly to mind. My ex husband would hospitalise anyone he caught doing that as would many men. You have to be careful, even if the shoes belong to a girl of 15 years and 11 months old she is still classed as a child (unless you are a tour operator or airline).
You have to make that distinction when asking such a question.

[shoddy90]

Do not wish to pick points at randon, and as I said, I noticed the thread was old and your viewpoint was clear. From my perspective, there is no issue with your intentions, moral stance or views, nor any question or desire for yours or anyones membership to be deleted. Regarding suggestion to remove that word, no cover-up was intended, merely consideration of avoiding unwelcome attention to our little area of the web by its use.
I am not a moderator, merely a fellow member, and as little time to make comment, I hope you will forgive me paraphrasing something I put on a previous thread when similar questions were raised:

..... The fetish aside, we all have hopefully otherwise fairly normal lives and emotional relations to others, despite it seems, most often some hangups because of this sexual predilection. I am not sure if studies and statistics exist, but it may be that the incidence of "serious" sex related crimes among a group who regularly and routinely achieve full sexual gratification with a desired, compliant and available fetish object such as shoes, could represent a considerably lower percentage than among the "normal" population, and more generally perhaps, some parents of teens could sleep much easier knowing a boyfriends sexual interest was in their daughters shoes.

I fully agree there need to be limits to behaviors, but whether we or others like it or not, those limits will only be fully engaged though self imposition, and perhaps in that there is some personal need to consider if not fully understand your own psychological make-up and relation to the fetish. While any of our varied footwear fun may be considered entirely unsavory by outsiders; even by some with their own variation of it, any actions or behaviors we engage in should not harm others or in any way lead to that occurring. If you realise that shoes or any other object are surrogates for a particular young owner or that age group then you should seek help. Hopefully through some discussion of the difficulties and dilemmas this fetish brings, individuals may come to self realization, and do so.

The moderators do a great job in maintaining the board with a mixture of fantasy, personal experience and sexual stimulation, and while they ensure anything too questionable is deleted, I would hope we can all agree that nothing improper should be ever placed here or be searched for

[challanger244]

i mean my first was cumming in the shooes i had when i was 12 i kept them as i liked them and i dont throw stuff out anyway so it was more i left them in my room and they exsisted as i always fiddle with stuff and i liked putting shoes on anyway but yeah when i was 16.5 ish i cummed in my 'kids' shoes so meh
i also know some adults that buy kids shoes because there feet are to small for male addult so yeah if you are going to be against it be what there reason for cumming is and not where i guess

[dages46]

If you cum in a shoe that's made for kids then the only way i could think of it as fine is if the kid doesn't use the shoe and you only like it for the shoe and not because of the person who wore it then it's ok but morally wrong or buy a brand new pair. but overall if your turned on by their feet and the smell then it's completely wrong but if you only like how the shoe looks and don't care about who wore them then it's not as bad since it's just a shoe.