Page 3 of 26
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:17 am
by rorschach
10-4 mate. Unless they address me by name or quote one of my posts, I'll behave
Sorry to have muddied your topic. I apologize. Please carry on.
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:21 am
by junglist
rorschach wrote:10-4 mate. Unless they address me by name or quote one of my posts, I'll behave
Sorry to have muddied your topic. I apologize. Please carry on.
Thats ok & no need to apologise to me. You had to get something off your chest, I understand that.
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:50 am
by flats_et_heels_lover
rorschach wrote:shoxlover wrote:Most find it wrong and sick and the most heinous thing possible and to allow such talk would be to condone it. I for one was pretty well disgusted by that, even if it is just discussion it's wrong. Why are you getting so bent out of shape about it? All they did was say it is not allowed in their forum. If you want to discuss that find a different venue.
And just who the hell are you to judge?! Get off your high horse! Some folks might find it pretty sick & wrong to not only get turned on by, but to also moleste inanimate objects, i.e. footwear. Especially, of all things: Nikes & Asics

But your "fetish" doesn't stop there, now does it? It just wouldn't be enough to just shove your penis in inanimate object, without the owners consent, by the way. No, it looks like you also enjoy deficating & relieving yourself on that same object. Sorta like a common pet that hasn't been house broken yet. Ya know, I ain't the smartest person in the world (that honour goes to Ozymandias) but imma go out on a limb here & say that most "normal" people would find your fetish "sick, wrong, & pretty heinous" in its own right! Now It'd be one thing to do what you do to total strangers' shoes but you purposefully go out of your way to do it your own sister & mothers shoes! Wow. Some folks around here might even associate that with an incestual fantasy. I'm just sayin'. I don't have to go into how "sick, wrong, & heinous" that would be, now do I?! No, I didn't think so.
Lemme ask you something: What are your thoughts on bondage? Oh, you like that, huh? Uh-huh. Just what do you like about it? You like being in control? You like dominating a person? Making them bend to your will? Causing them pain? That turn you on, big guy? Make you feel powerful? You like making them your bitch? Shoving objects into every orifice in thier body. Even if say, that object is too big, causing them not only much pain & discomfort, but bleeding as well. Is that what you like? Or maybe you like the roles reversed and you like being "the bitch". Which I for one would find pretty disgusting...but hey, I try not to judge my fellow pervert based on their, um, "sexual quirks"....maybe you shouldn't either,
capisci?
>high horse
For one, wetshoe is a mod if I'm not mistaken. Secondly, he's been here for many years, and has had experience with this matter. He is right though. Even in America, discussing children sexually can in certain conditions be against child pornography laws.
http://www.ottawasun.com/news/ottawa/20 ... 70841.html.
And the moderators could be liable for anything that is written. Even though you might feel like this sort of behavior is innocent, the facts are, that it is legally gray at best. And you endanger everyone on the site by starting that sort of discussion. The reality of the matter is, the police/fbi don't give two shits about anecdotal evidence about guys cumming in ladies shoes . The act of cumming in a shoe is property damage, or possibly sexual harassment/assault at worse. These crimes are fundamentally different from child pornography in that they are only real crimes if someone presses charges. The state isn't going to nab you for cumming in a pair of heels if the owner doesn't want them to. The same is not true for the other one. So it is non sequitor for you to put everyone else in your boat.
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:04 am
by rorschach
Anybody else got anything to say to me; please come on down to the basement where
MY topic is. The place where we have full rein & the kid gloves can come off. Please don't disappoint me, gentlemen. Especially you shrimp-boy
Here's the link -------->
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38481 <------------------
My humble apologies again,
junglist. Sorry, my man, I tried.
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:18 am
by sh03s
Just ban this guy.
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:46 am
by junglist
rorschach wrote:Here's the link -------->
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=38481
My humble apologies again,
junglist. Sorry, my man, I tried.
Thanks for posting that link Rorschach. Now please stay out of this tread unless you have anything constructive about the topic to say & anyone else who wants to rile up Rorschach, take yourself over to his page.
On topic, I'm taking a vote on either the Daniel frilly blue suede peep toe shoes boots or the Carvela shiny black patent strappy mary janes to be cummed next. Most votes between now & next available opportunity get treated. My vote is for the black mary janes, even though I do love suede peep toe shoe boots SO much
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:04 am
by shoe_spunk3999
My vote goes to the black Carvela's

Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:28 am
by shrimper
My vote, the Carvelas.
Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:06 pm
by stken
Definitely the blue suede peep toes. There shouldn't be a vote about that. Those are freaking hot!

Re: Home alone in someone elses house looking for shoes
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:08 pm
by heel spurter
the black mary janes